![]() "It was extremely difficult at times, particularly at the end of the month, as call after call from people who had basically spent all their money for the month came in, and they needed some help from somewhere to make it to the first of the next month. Geri said he learned how dire budgeting can get for families after working for a crisis hotline. Because the Federal Poverty Level is generally the baseline measure of financial hardship, the report says a "huge portion" of people who are struggling financially are being missed. In order to be financial stable, that family would need $124,764. ALICE data says the same family in Washington needs $77,328 per year minimum just to survive. In 2021, the Federal Poverty Level for a family of four with two children in childcare, was $26,500 a year. "I don't think there's a better data set right now that is as comprehensive and is as consistent and reliable as ALICE." "It's one of the most, if not the most, comprehensive attempts to describe what's happening with families that are employed, but still struggling to make ends meet across the country," Geri said. ALICE accounts for many factors including housing, childcare, transportation, and even technology and taxes. Geri said ALICE data is a more comprehensive look at how much it costs to have a reasonable standard of living. "The federal government's basic measure of poverty is based on what it costs to provide a basic basket of food, and then they multiply that by three times, which is really pretty limited as a way of measuring how to think about people who have clearly very complicated needs," said Larry Geri, faculty member at The Evergreen State College who was on the Pacific Northwest ALICE research advisory committee. Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) describes people who are working, making more than the Federal Poverty Level, but not making enough money to cover their basic needs where they live. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.Īs a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.About one in three Washington households are not making enough money to make ends meet, according to recently released data from a national research group called United for ALICE. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.īBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. Read MoreīBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.īBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. I do have ***'s available, but am unwilling to share them with Radia since it appears that they may be a fraudulent/sham business attempting to obtain personal information of "marks" rather than a legitimate company. I saw them, my insurance paid them, and it is very deceptive to get a third-party bill for services already covered by my insurance. Rockwood advertises that a 3D mammo is $65 without insurance and $0 with it (as I have). That claim shows a charge of $214.90 for the same mammogram/3D mammogram, but it was denied (Medical Claim # DW49582680) due to : You do not owe this amount because either (1) you chose a network provider that gives us a standing discount, (2) you chose an out-of-network provider that agreed to an amount less than billed, or (3) it is a surprise bill and the law protects you from having to pay it.I don't even know this company. I assume they are a contractor of some type, but there business should be with Rockwood rather than me. There is a second charge/separate claim for the same service from an unknown/unseen company called Radia. United *********** then paid the full outstanding balance of $186.28 under my plan. There was a plan discount of $155.72 through the contract agreement. I verified that they were in network with UHC and that I had a $0 copay prior to the appointment. I received a mammogram/3D mammogram through *************** on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |